A candid round table discussion with special guests Dr. Carrie Madej, Dr. Lee Merritt & Dr. Christiane Northrup on the latest developments about the effects the shots are having on a growing number of people who are around those who received the shot.
This is NOT a vaccine! It’s being called a vaccine to fall under the exemptions of the PREP Act that affords manufacturers “immunity.” Just because they call it something doesn’t mean that’s what it is. The cardinal maxim of semantics is:
“The map is not the territory, the thing is not the thing named”
What’s In The Shots?
Mandating A Product – How did we get here?
The sheer absurdity that politicians are considering mandating a new product they call a vaccine, Which uses CRISPR gene editing technology to replace your natural immunity with synthetic programmable updates from quantum computers claiming it’s “safe and effective” as defined in Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, under USC section 505(b)(1) is deception on steroids.
SAFE Acronym for surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness and environmental change. This complex of measures is a strategy for the control of TRACOMA and has been shown to be effective in endemic areas.
SAFE Cardiology A clinical trial–Safety After Fifty Evaluation
Fifty – a set of this many persons or things
EFFECTIVE actually in force.
Producing a strong impression or response; striking: gave an effective performance as Othello
No one should tolerate being extorted to enroll in a 2 year study and take their untested snakeoil poison knowing they made sure to have no liability should something go wrong.
We already are seeing something has gone terribly wrong. Since 2020 COVID-19 has redefined the basic principles of science & undermined the institution bringing many long held theories like viruses in particular into question. The rhetoric of scientism is more important than the science itself.
the question is Cui bono? “to whom is it a benefit?”
By Vera Hassner Sharav, Medical Ethics and Contemporary Medicine, Vaccine Epidemic
At the Nuremberg Doctors’ Trials, the stated rationale for the medical atrocities was that the “crimes against humanity” were for “the greater good.”
“Mandatory vaccination policy is predicated on two problematic rationales. The first rationale in support of mandatory vaccination is that vaccines are “safe.” Unlike other medical interventions, vaccines are given to healthy children and adults, and they are known to cause severe adverse effects —some of which are endemic to the disease against which they are intended to protect. Indeed, legally, vaccines are classified as “unavoidably unsafe,” an indication that they pose an inherent risk. Recall the “MEDICAL” definition of SAFE in Cardiology is: A clinical trial – Safety After Fifty Evaluation which includes “things ” This raises the question of what legalease wordsmithing is being used to permit the trials despite the horrific numbers OpenVAERS is reporting on adverse events & deaths.
Vaccines have not been subjected to scientifically rigorous, placebo-controlled safety trials before they have been approved for use in children. Instead, they are tested by exposing healthy human beings to one of two vaccines—each of which poses risks of harm—so the true magnitude of risk is masked. Most of the data, including government-gathered data, are undisclosed and inaccessible for independent scientific scrutiny. This raises serious concerns about the integrity of publicly disseminated claims about vaccine safety.
The second rationale given for mandatory vaccination is the necessity to “protect the herd,” that is, for “the greater good of society.” The [German] doctors at Nuremberg used the very same rationale—and it was rejected. Mass vaccination of healthy children whose lives are put at risk “to protect the herd” is tantamount to a massive, involuntary human experiment in violation of the “absolutely essential” human right to “voluntary, informed consent” under the Nuremberg Code. Mandatory vaccination policies for children have provoked an extremely contentious battle. How can anyone justify a public policy that forces vulnerable infants and young children to bear the burden of risk and suffering—including neurological damage, seizures, permanent disability, and death—for “herd immunity”?
By age eighteen, children in the United States receive seventy doses of sixteen vaccines. Infants, whose immune systems are undeveloped, are exposed to more than thirty-three doses of over one dozen vaccines by fifteen months of age, including hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, rubella, measles, mumps, chickenpox, pneumococcal infections, Haemophifus Influenzae type b, and influenza. Moreover, infants are being vaccinated not only against childhood diseases but also against diseases to which they are unlikely to be exposed for the express purpose to protect adults.
For example, why are newborn infants on the day of birth being vaccinated against hepatitis B. a disease contracted by having unprotected sex or sharing needles? Furthermore, why are two-month-old infants vaccinated against tetanus, which is extremely rare, occurs primarily in older populations, is effectively treatable after exposure, and is not contagious? To gain even a cursory appreciation of the level of risk to which infants and children are exposed, one should examine The Merck Manual. It acknowledges that vaccines contain toxoids, weakened bacteria that can cause severe, debilitating symptoms—including life-threatening conditions, such as encephalitis.
U.S. medicine is dominated by corporate interests—physicians, academic institutions, and government agencies—whose financial interests are intertwined with drug and vaccine manufacturers. Physicians, professional associations, medical institutions, and government agencies are collaborating partners in the business of medicine. The practice of medicine, medical research, and medical information dissemination channels are imbued with the utilitarian business ethics calculus. Thus individuals and communities are viewed as the means by which to increase profits. Neither individuals nor the citizenry are well served when the integrity of medicine is debased, its scientific method is tainted, and its humanitarian and moral principles are violated with impunity.
Conflicts of interest compromise our current vetting system for medical research. The system is designed to bring new products to the market with little regard for their lack of therapeutic value or their potential safety hazards. The system fails to ensure that drugs, vaccines, and medical devices are adequately tested for safety and therapeutic value. The most vulnerable populations—children, the elderly, and the disabled—are unprotected from bad medicine, defective medical products, and unethical physicians.
A government-funded experiment, the “fenfluramine challenge,” encapsulates an enduring eugenics mindset within U.S. academic medicine. From 1993 to 1996, senior researchers at the New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI) (including the current chairman of child psychiatry at Columbia University, Queens College, and Mount Sinai School of Medicine, conducted pseudoscientific, wholly non-therapeutic “predisposition to violence” experiments.
State and federal governments funded the experiments. Researchers administered intravenously the neurotoxic drug fenfluramine to one hundred mostly African American and Hispanic boys, aged six to eleven. The researchers sought to prove a eugenic hypothesis, that violent or criminal behavior could be predicted using biological markers, such as levels of brain chemicals.
Revelations at the Doctors’ Trial in Nuremberg are indelible—they cannot be redacted from history … an object lesson of how the government’s usurpation of individual civil liberties and the collapse of professional and institutional integrity—in particular, economic, medical, and legal integrity, which are the underpinnings of a civilized society—led an entire society to be swept into the maim of genocidal murder. The stated rationale for the medical atrocities that were “crimes against humanity” was that they were for “the greater good.”
The silence of the medical community—in both Germany and the United States—about its role and responsibility after it turned its back on the Hippocratic tradition in favor of eugenics is an indication that the medical community is conflicted. There has been no disavowal of eugenic healthcare practices carried out “for the greater good,” which threaten individual human rights and civilized medicine. Physicians’ efforts to distance themselves from these atrocities—the apex of murderous medicine—by spreading the myth that such medical atrocities were the work of deranged scientists is an attempt to delude the public, and themselves, about the profession’s criminal culpability.
When medical trends veer from the moral Hippocratic tradition, professionals lose their moral footing and are capable of committing medical atrocities. Mandatory public health policies that trample on personal human rights for the claimed “greater good” threaten individual liberties and the very foundation of a civilized, democratic society.
Doctors who practice medicine “for the greater good” participate in a culture that views the individual as a means to an end. Such a culture may set in motion increasingly abusive medical practices culminating in medical atrocities. Unless we confront these moral shortcomings and establish viable safeguards, no one can be safe, and the long shadows of [the crimes addressed at Nuremberg] will continue to haunt us.”
Authorization To Poison
Show Notes: Behind The Woodshed
TRUTH & LIES: WILL THE STORM BE UPON US?
- COVID mRNA “vaccine” is not a vaccine
- German scientists discover why covid vaccines cause blood clots
- We May All Have Morgellons Disease and It Is Man Made!
- Another Controversial Natural Treatment FDA and Media Colluded To Ostracize
- AUTHORISATION TO SUPPLY A POISON WITHOUT A PRESCRIPTION
- STAY AWAY FROM THE VAXXED, IT IS OFFICIAL, FROM PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS
- “Vaccidents” now wrecking roadways with stroked-out vaccine takers who lose brain function behind the wheel
- Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?
- LETHAL INJECTION 2: A CORRUPTION OF BLOOD
- TITLE 50
- Nuremberg Trials For Big Pharma’s Crimes Against Humanity Underway
- 25 Images of Nazi Medical Experiments – Murderous doctors and tortured patients
- Do We Have A Right To Privacy and Cognitive Liberty?
- Passport to the Brave New World: the vaccine
- Critically Thinking with DrT and DrP
- Authorization To Poison
DIGGING YOUR OWN GRAVE
- Fast-Tracking Mandatory Vaccination While Government and Media Muzzle
- Oregon Pediatrician Publishes Study Comparing His Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children Then Has His Medical License Suspended
- The Childhood Vaccination Moratorium :: Dr. Rima Truth Reports
- Congress Receives Vaccine Safety Project Details Including Actions Needed for Sound Science and Transparency • World Mercury Project
- Flu Vaccines: What are the Facts?